Page 2 of 2
Re: SON Power Draw Electronic Vs Magnetic
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 6:04 pm
by fluorescent
I've got a Holophane Wallpackette 70w SON on part night. I just can't justify burning ~90w all night, every night.
I would prefer magnetic & will maybe convert it one day, but for now I think I'll try the 40w Clusterlite. It'll be interesting to see how well it lasts actually, they're supposed to be very good lamps.
Re: SON Power Draw Electronic Vs Magnetic
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:55 pm
by FrontSideBus
With the 18w SOX in my patio Gamma 6 nearing 3 years, I'm wondering what I should replace it with when it dies. I'm thinking 18w PL-L tbh.
Re: SON Power Draw Electronic Vs Magnetic
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:54 am
by AngryHorse
90watt does sound a bit high, Thorn and Philips have a total circuit draw of 86 watts, and I know you won’t want to hear this
, but I had 70watt SON lighting my back garden, but changing to a 32watt, wide distribution Philips Uni-street made a big difference!
Re: SON Power Draw Electronic Vs Magnetic
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:39 pm
by Kev
See I’ve been playing with power monitoring lately on my fittings, I have a Wi-fi power monitoring switch on my part night 150W SON flood. The current does vary through the evening it’s between 163 and 170W depending on what the voltage is doing on a part night it’s burning through 1.56 kWh which is about 20p a night seeing as these are winter months and the longest burning hours even worst case that’s £73 a year, I can live with that just fine.
Going to do the same to my ZX1 100W and my ME 35