Page 3 of 3
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:36 pm
by Ash
In the context of starters, did it have any ever ? From what i recall that Dor told me - it went straight from PS to T5 HF
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 7:16 am
by dor123
Dor does camel hospital not have any fluorescent left now???
The Storages of Carmel hospital moved from Gaash 2x40W T12/2x36W T8 switch-start to Gaash Sealight Plus 2x28W T5.
And why you calling Carmel hospital "Camel hospital" @Kev???
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 7:22 am
by dor123
See
this video to know why I hate the Osram St111 starters.
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:17 pm
by Kev
Dor does camel hospital not have any fluorescent left now???
The Storages of Carmel hospital moved from Gaash 2x40W T12/2x36W T8 switch-start to Gaash Sealight Plus 2x28W T5.
And why you calling Carmel hospital "Camel hospital" @Kev???
I have always called it the camel hospital for many years dor
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2024 12:55 am
by Funkybulb
Worse starters in the US ive see is those shit HN starters
Re: The worst quality fluorescent starter you've ever seen?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2024 5:38 pm
by Ash
"hn" used to come in 2 styles made of 2 different types of plastic :
The very white plastic, with a logo that looks like : HN (in a frame) - Those crumble from the lamp UV
The little off white plastic, with a logo that looks like : hn (on a square of red background) - Those have better plastic that stays ok
The latter were often the OEM starters included with some of the final switchstart fittings from Gaash (around ~2010..2012) and many are still out there and working now - So are not bad starters
If my guess is right that the present day Osram "ST111 Longlife" are rebadged hn then they will be about the same
