Comparing Triphosphor and Halophosphate White

File information
Filename:	PA080201.JPG
Album name:	BC5-80 / Fluorescent tubes
Filesize:	67 KiB
Date added:	15 Oct, 2015
Dimensions:	1024 x 576 pixels
Displayed:	22 times
URL:	http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=1636
Favourites:	Remove from Favourites

Comment 1 to 5 of 5

Page: 1

Danny

[15 Oct, 2015 at 10:01 PM]

Good picture!!! If im correct wasnt the 835 meant to be the new 35?

BC5-80

[15 Oct, 2015 at 10:25 PM]

I don't know Danny. That would only work if they banned halophosphate to leave off the 8 without there being too much ambiguity.

Danny

[15 Oct, 2015 at 10:28 PM]

Theyve already banned halophosphate above 13w i think that went in 2010

Kev

[16 Oct, 2015 at 11:52 PM]

Yep long banned! You wouldn't thing that triphosphor tubes date back to the early 70s!

BC5-80

[18 Oct, 2015 at 11:21 PM]

I had no idea triphosphors went back that far. I've been gob-smacked by the T12 Triphosphor relics that have been flaunted on the forums. I also didn't realise that most halophosphates had already been banned. That explains why they've been installing decent tubes at work for the past few years instead of the grotty dingy bog-standard White, and I thought they were being selective. Shocked

Comment 1 to 5 of 5

Page: 1