|
FILE 63/66 |
|
|||
|
File information | |
Filename: | Three_Netalines_for_first_test_1.JPG |
Album name: | BC5-80 / Fittings |
Filesize: | 279 KiB |
Date added: | 19 Oct, 2015 |
Dimensions: | 1280 x 720 pixels |
Displayed: | 56 times |
URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=1744 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 11 of 11 Page: 1 |
|
|||
Bloody hell, never thought I'd see NOS Netalines where did you find these?
|
|
|||
Bull Electrical -> J & N Factors in mid 90s. Premises and jaw-dropping stock must be long gone.
|
|
|||
lol probably the horriblest fittings made but on the other hand what a bloody good haul
|
|
|||
Amazing! Boxes look just like those in the TV ad, never thought I'd see real ones!
|
|
|||
Wow! What a sight.
|
|
|||
I don't think I'd ever use one in earnest with the electric fire element/hazard along the spine. I have a 'nice' Indian-made Philips electronic ballast (discrete circuit with bipolar transistors) standing by to convert one.
|
|
|||
Forgive my ignorance but I'm new to these forums. I keep seeing "NOS". I assume it means new but what does it actually stand for?
|
|
|||
New Old Stock
|
|
|||
If your tempted to use it, it'd be fine with the shrouded heating element "resistor", it's shrouded in asbestos (heat resistent) cloth. I had mine running for about a year with no probs - and thats with 50 years of kitchen grease all over the fitting. The spine does get hot to the touch but not flash point.
|
|
|||
Thanks Arrowslim. It make sense (NOS). And thanks amtrakuk. I might risk an unmodified installation with original resistive ballast for that authentic feel. Perhaps lower down in the house where the additional heat would be put to better use.
|
|
|||
a worthwhile save just for the tubes alone me thinks
|
Comment 1 to 11 of 11 Page: 1 |