Mazda 5' 80W BC New Warm White
The 'R' after 80W suggests Reflector, but it's not

Mazda 5' 80W BC New Warm White

The 'R' after 80W suggests Reflector, but it's not

MAZDA_40W_Warm_White_De_Luxe_5.JPG Mazda_5__80W_BC_New_Warm_White_1.JPG Mazda_5__80W_BC_New_Warm_White_2.JPG Mazda_5__80W_BC_New_Warm_White_3.JPG Mazda_5__80W_BC_New_Warm_White_4.JPG
File information
Filename:Mazda_5__80W_BC_New_Warm_White_2.JPG
Album name:BC5-80 / Fluorescent tubes
Manufacturer:Mazda
Wattage:80W
Filesize:65 KiB
Date added:02 Jul, 2017
Dimensions:1024 x 576 pixels
Displayed:33 times
URL:http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=6383
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1

eclipsislamps   [02 Jul, 2017 at 10:53 PM]
Does the colour differ at all to modern 29? wondering if the early versions of it were a little different
BC5-80   [02 Jul, 2017 at 11:08 PM]
I haven't done a side-by-side comparison but it looks like normal warm white to me.
Danny   [03 Jul, 2017 at 11:28 PM]
Never heard of new warm white it looks quite deep though i wonder if its the same as the "home lite"?
BC5-80   [04 Jul, 2017 at 12:15 AM]
No, it's not as warm as Home-Lite or Deluxe Warm White or similar. It just looks like bog standard warm white to me.
James   [09 Jul, 2017 at 10:36 PM]
I believe the New prefix was added to the colour names of some companies between about 1946-1948, following the introduction of the calcium halophosphate coatings. These phosphors were first introduced by GEC in 1946 and by 1950 their technology had been licensed to or adopted by every fluorescent manufacturer worldwide, even the Americans, because they were non-toxic, much more efficient and considerably cheaper than the original zinc beryllium silicate phosphors. Since the colours were slightly different after this upgrade, the change of name helped to ensure that only lamps of the same type were used in an installation. So if this is a post-1946 lamp, its colour will indeed be identical to modern Colour 29 / 530.
BC5-80   [25 Jul, 2017 at 04:37 PM]
Thank you for that useful explanation, James. It makes sense.

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1

Add your comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed here. Log in to post your comment