|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FILE 95/121 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
File information | |
Filename: | IMG_20160321_104704.jpg |
Album name: | eclipsislamps / Gettings |
Filesize: | 2859 KiB |
Date added: | 21 Mar, 2016 |
Dimensions: | 2730 x 2048 pixels |
Displayed: | 38 times |
URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=3415 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |
|
|||
It's mint!
|
|
|||
Looks like fucking new inside!
|
|
|||
The Arc's certainly have good gaskets!
|
|
|||
Oh yes, they are brilliantly designed generally, just a shame that same amount of thought didn't go into the aesthetics. This lantern comes across to me as if someone has paid a lot for it at some point.
|
|
|||
Probably THE best HID lantern on the market today!
![]() |
|
|||
Like these aswell except for the droopy bowl version, luckily most are flat or curved glass here
![]() ![]() |
|
|||
Agree, looks shit with the droopy bowl but looks ace with flat or curved glass.
|
|
|||
they are a strong well made lantern, if the clip comes undone the wind rips the tops of them first seen them in 2003, was that when they first came out?
|
|
|||
Have to say, I've always liked these. I think the lantern looks fairly decent and is reasonably well made by modern standards. A pity the ones round here are now being culled for LED. Most are only 4-6 yrs old and have their original lamps. All being scrapped, a complete waste!
|
|
|||
Yeah such a shame their a quality fitting. They're using secondhand ones of these here to replace failed SOX now, Arcs probably come from a different county thats gone LED
|
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |