|
||||
| FILE 18/40 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | 20250526_135902.jpg |
| Album name: | Flurofan96 / Halogen |
| Filesize: | 2394 KiB |
| Date added: | 26 May, 2025 |
| Dimensions: | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Displayed: | 355 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=23041 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
It’s a shame the capsule ones were a bit flimsy in the filament
, the Halogena was the best versions
|
|
|||
|
I never took to these later halogen GLS lamps particularly, always preferred standard incandescent offerings of the usual brands, however I did rather like these Osram ones, the packaging always looked quite professional and the green capping cement was a nice feature too
|
|
|||
|
@Angryhorse and @Beta 5: Yes I never was exactly too fond of the eco halogen retrofit bulbs for many reasons especially how thin and flimsy they felt, plus not having the 'cool factor' like the HalogenA. I do now try to collect eco halogen bulbs especially from OSRAM but the HalogenA takes full priority
|
|
|||
|
@AngryHorse: But this lamp are also good, and lasts as long as the HalogenA.
|
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |