Timeguard 36w spiral T5 tube
Ebay find. These were sold as over-priced spares for floodlights that never really caught on. Although these are cheaply made they are still quite uncommon and interesting.

Timeguard 36w spiral T5 tube

Ebay find. These were sold as over-priced spares for floodlights that never really caught on. Although these are cheaply made they are still quite uncommon and interesting.

Screenshot_20210506-171320.jpg Screenshot_20210519-162754.jpg Screenshot_20210522-113328.jpg Screenshot_20210522-172026.jpg Screenshot_20210603-125421.jpg
File information
Filename:Screenshot_20210522-113328.jpg
Album name:LAllenLighting / CFL lamps
Manufacturer:Timeguard
Wattage:36w
Date manufactured:2000s - 2010s
Filesize:137 KiB
Date added:22 May, 2021
Dimensions:847 x 671 pixels
Displayed:27 times
URL:http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=15891
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 5 of 5
Page: 1

FrontSideBus   [22 May, 2021 at 12:26 PM]
That is one funkly lamp eh lol.
Oliver   [22 May, 2021 at 04:07 PM]
I remember when these were sold. There were also versions which were like a normal 20w CFL but on it's side. The main problem with these was that no well known companies made them meaning your only option was to get low quality ones. I think some versions were also PIR and instant start so not good at all. If I had a fitting with one of these I'd either run it on a photocell or have it on 24/7.
Ash   [22 May, 2021 at 06:34 PM]
Reminds of some things Opple did - Proprietary lamp with questionable future availability. Though it's interesting thought experiment what we would have thought if we would be around in the early 80s when the 2D were introduced....
AngryHorse   [22 May, 2021 at 07:52 PM]
I’m surprised these didn’t catch on more?, sadly these were cheaply made tube with daylight white halo phosphates!, like Ollie says, if the top manufacturers would have used tri-phosphor T5s and coiled them like this, I reckon they would have found a market in industry?
Ash   [22 May, 2021 at 10:11 PM]
That would be allready fulfilled by the cheaper to make and better efficiency PL

Comment 1 to 5 of 5
Page: 1

Add your comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed here. Log in to post your comment