|
FILE 165/172 |
|
|||
|
File information | |
Filename: | PICT0892.JPG |
Album name: | Dave / Lanterns |
Filesize: | 1663 KiB |
Date added: | 09 Mar, 2019 |
Dimensions: | 2050 x 1537 pixels |
Displayed: | 40 times |
URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=10604 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 5 of 5 Page: 1 |
|
|||
did it come from me? can't remember
|
|
|||
The diffuser look great!
|
|
|||
the bowls on these are wafer thin, infact lieing one on its side like this on a hard surface dents in the underside of the bowl the lantern is so heavy, best to lay it on a bit of carpet or mount the fitting on a bracket up your loft to avoid it getting broke
|
|
|||
Makes you wonder what the obsession was with HUGE bowls on low pressure sodium lanterns, surly putting autoleaks ‘in lantern’ wasn’t the real reason for this?
|
|
|||
The lantern came from a ex collector from the scottish borders. Its now stored in my loft on its back to prevent undue weight from being on the bowl. I think its just the design of the lantern where the ballast had to be directly above the lamp that meant they had to have these huge bowls, its purely down to design. The likes of the Eleco GR102 featured an autoleak ballast behind the lamp, meaning a standard gearless bowl could be used. The autoleak ballast really did play a part in the size of the lantern, a great example being the early deep base of the Thorn Gamma 6. made specially for these huge ballasts of the time.
|
Comment 1 to 5 of 5 Page: 1 |