|
||||
| FILE 2619/9150 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | 20220811_170628.jpg |
| Album name: | Flurofan96 / CFL |
| Filesize: | 1987 KiB |
| Date added: | 07 Mar, 2024 |
| Dimensions: | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Displayed: | 359 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=20272 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 5 of 5 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
The GE will start dimmer than the Philips, but will outlast it MANY times over.
|
|
|||
|
I've seen the utter poor performance of the Philips branded 2D lamps at my cousin's previous flat - he had to get 2 of these only for them to last a few months until I eventually went my way to get a GE 28W tube and it lasted until he moved out in early 2017. I bet it is still in use today
|
|
|||
|
Yeah some of the GE's I've had start up extremely dim, though soon brighten up. The Philips is probably on the same level as any other cheapo lamp which is a shame considering how good their PL lamps are.
|
|
|||
|
The ASD branded 2D 28W lamp in the downstairs loo is approaching its 1 year use and still working as normal - which is far better than the approx 2 months lasting of both Philips PL-Q 28W lamps (in my cousins previous flat)
|
|
|||
|
For GE lamps, I'd only use them on pre programmed electronic ballasts or magnetic/switchstart because I hate the idea of damaging them by the sputtering caused by instant start ballasts no matter how top notch quality the 2D lamps by GE or Thorn are
|
Comment 1 to 5 of 5 Page: 1 |