Yet another Helvar HF failure

These must be some of the shitest HF ballasts from a usually trusted brand. We struggle to get two years out of this style of Helvar ballast at work. This one is actually about 4 years old but has only been used for a few hours Monday to Friday. I wouldn't have expected quite so much blackening and destruction inside if that usage is correct.

Yet another Helvar HF failure


These must be some of the shitest HF ballasts from a usually trusted brand. We struggle to get two years out of this style of Helvar ballast at work. This one is actually about 4 years old but has only been used for a few hours Monday to Friday. I wouldn't have expected quite so much blackening and destruction inside if that usage is correct.

20190218_092602.jpg 20181028_173922rs.jpg Helvar_Fail.jpg IMG_9818.JPG IMG_9877.JPG
File information
Filename:Helvar_Fail.jpg
Album name:fluorescent / Fail
Filesize:2962 KiB
Date added:20 Jul, 2020
Dimensions:2417 x 1804 pixels
Displayed:40 times
URL:http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=14165
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1

FrontSideBus   [21 Jul, 2020 at 12:45 AM]
That has got VERY HOT! Look at the discolouration on that side of the PCB!
Slyspark   [21 Jul, 2020 at 10:26 AM]
These certainly are crap!
AngryHorse   [21 Jul, 2020 at 08:39 PM]
What, worse than Tridonic? Very Happy
Slyspark   [21 Jul, 2020 at 08:58 PM]
Probably on a par with the current Tridonic offerings....
Ash   [21 Jul, 2020 at 10:39 PM]
Counting on the PCB copper to dissipate the heat and then using single sided 1 Oz or less PCB is not something going to last well... Looks like that darkened area is where the PFC is. The blow up looks like the PFC current sense resistor
thorncollector   [29 Jul, 2020 at 12:49 PM]
HF=High failure must be poorly designed thermally/poor quality components

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1

Add your comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed here. Log in to post your comment