|
||||
| FILE 10/9333 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | IMG_4691.jpeg |
| Album name: | Kev / Jobs 2026 |
| Filesize: | 2449 KiB |
| Date added: | 04 Apr, 2026 |
| Dimensions: | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Displayed: | 17 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=24336 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
Good to test them against those 250W Tridonic mag trays I brought exactly what they replaced lol
|
|
|||
|
One advantage of these electronic ballast is they really do not care about the supply voltage! I have had one on the variac and swung the dial back and forth like a madman and there is no change in output, not even a flicker. On mag gear, reducing or increasing the voltage by just a few volts results in a visible change in output!
|
|
|||
|
Oh yeh I could easily do that tomorrow they are complete trays with a cap so good fair comparison. I was surprised the losses were so high on these. I’m feeling the itch to install 250W SON or CMH on my farm
|
|
|||
|
Yeh that’s true mark - I wonder what voltage they have had enough at?
|
|
|||
|
Be interesting to find out. Might have a go tomorrow.
|
|
|||
|
Compare results lol
|
|
|||
|
These do run at a perfect power factor also
|
|
|||
|
The only style of Philips ballast like this that I have is a Cosmo, which I have stabilising for a bit then I will go silly with the variac .
|
|
|||
|
Well that was interesting... I let the voltage and current stabilise at 240v input, then cranked it up to 275v. Absolutely no change in the readings at all. Not even a flicker. Then I dropped the voltage right down to 200v. Again not a sausage. But the ballast was pulling more current from the mains. In fact the lamp current and voltage did not change until I lowered the input voltage to 155v and then it extinguished!
|
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |