FILE 59/619 |
|
|||
|
File information | |
Filename: | IMG_20200501_004714.jpg |
Album name: | fluorescent / Jobs & Misc. (On Topic) |
Filesize: | 2349 KiB |
Date added: | 01 May, 2020 |
Dimensions: | 2594 x 1879 pixels |
Displayed: | 39 times |
URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=13740 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |
|
|||
Light spread doesn’t look great (darker in the middle) also very shadowy since they are glarey with no diffuser
|
|
|||
Someone didn't really think that one through all that well....
|
|
|||
Yup fittings are too high up so virtually no light is emitted under the lower part of the roof! Emailed the team leaders hopefully they'll hang them lower from chains. Light spread is actually not bad with these (under the part that's actually lit)
|
|
|||
It wouldn't surprise me if nothing gets done about it
|
|
|||
Nasty LEDs, every day I hate the bastards more and more.
|
|
|||
Andy, I fully agree with that!
|
|
|||
Oh dear lol. Didn’t he installers check the aiming before they fucked off?
|
|
|||
Crap agree with the vicar.
|
|
|||
These aren't the worst things in the world. Light spread is good (when installed properly!), nice colour, seem reasonable quality wise and aren't too expensive compared to others. But yeah if they really wanted energy saving and to save money, they could have knocked every other fitting off as this bay was overlit before imo. Where each 200w LED fitting is there was previously a 400w son!
|
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |