|
||||
| FILE 21/239 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | 20250307_195645.jpg |
| Album name: | Flurofan96 / Fluroescent |
| Filesize: | 2618 KiB |
| Date added: | 07 Mar, 2025 |
| Dimensions: | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Displayed: | 510 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=22651 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 7 of 7 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
Could it be contaminated or just difficult to strike? Both ends are glowing whitish so should both have emitter on their cathodes?
|
|
|||
|
That's what it could be, difficult to strike, I'll need to try a starter that takes up to 125W tubes so that the 'overstrike' will hopefully jumpstart this tube back to life - I'll post an update if I get anywhere
|
|
|||
|
Update: Tried everything from a plasma ball to a bigger wattage starter - no good
|
|
|||
|
Is there any end blackening?
|
|
|||
|
Looks like the tubes lost vacuum.
|
|
|||
|
Have you tried it on HF? Sometimes an electronic starter or a manual start with a stuck starter can work, but it does sound like it is contaminated sadly
|
|
|||
|
I haven't tried that one yet - the electronic HF ballast, need to wire up the Fitzy fitting that has that b.a.g branded ballast and to see if that works. I've tried the Philips S10-E electronic starter and the EOL protection cutoff kicks in
|
Comment 1 to 7 of 7 Page: 1 |