 |
FILE 2/15 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||
|
 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | 20250518_123715.jpg |
| Album name: | AgentHalogen_87 / Street lanterns |
| Manufacturer: | Philips |
| Type/Model: | SGS101 |
| Wattage: | SON 70 |
| Date manufactured: | Nov 1998 |
| Filesize: | 9599 KiB |
| Date added: | 12 Apr, 2026 |
| Dimensions: | 4000 x 1800 pixels |
| Displayed: | 87 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=24472 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
Always thought these were a bit plasticy, but they seem to last ok
|
|
|||
|
They are a cheap build, but they certainly get the job done
|
|
|||
|
Indeed
They were often seen on footpaths here, probably fairly cheap to replace if they do get vandalised.
|
|
|||
|
They certainly seemed to past better than the other cheap offerings, such as the Thorn Riga and the Urbis Opalo range. Those were both terrible lanterns
|
|
|||
|
These are one of them lanterns that are so ugly that I actually like them lol. They are pretty solid mind. Probably a budget lantern from Phillips.
|
|
|||
|
Are you that one guy who donates stuff to Parrot175?
|
|
|||
|
Had to be post top mounted else they looked horrendous
|
|
|||
|
Sodium - Might be
 He was happy to pay for postage so I made sure the cost was worth it.
|
|
|||
|
Nick - Absolutely ugly with the upward tilt on a side entry arm I agree
|
|
|||
|
Yes I agree there too, post top they are fine but side entry they look terrible!
|
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |
Home
Login
Album list
Off topic
Last comments
Random
Most viewed
My Favourites
Search
