| FILE 22/114 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | DSC04074.JPG |
| Album name: | Dave / Fluorescent fittings |
| Rating (1 votes): | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Filesize: | 2403 KiB |
| Date added: | 09 Jun, 2019 |
| Dimensions: | 2850 x 2048 pixels |
| Displayed: | 559 times |
| URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=11709 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
Love this thing! Dunno what it's supposed to be and I don't think it knows what it's supposed to be but whatever it is it's terrifying and it never gets boring. Wonder how many of these 2D-BC-T12-things there are? Are those BC ends? What is it?
|
|
|||
|
Its basically the very first version of what we know today as the GX53 pizza CFL lamp. It was designed to be a compact fluorescent lamp, rated at 40w they certainly achieved it, but the fragility and expense of them (they were handmade) would have probably played a part in why they weren't so popular.
|
|
|||
|
Fascinating light this is!
|
|
|||
|
This is a legendary piece of fluorescent lighting history, it must be looked after incredibly carefully! Makes the 25w Philips W tube I have seem like a Genie CFL in comparison.
|
|
|||
|
Nice to see this lit, it's an absolultely fascinating tube and fitting
|
|
|||
|
Its in a corner where no one really goes, out the way on purpose so its completely safe. I want so bad to restore the fitting, but I can't bring myself to leave such a rare and fragile lamp floating round in the meantime.
|
|
|||
|
Excellent to see this lit, does it work on a standard F40T12 ballast or is the voltage higher? It seems strange that they went to the effort of making parallel tubes with bridged connections, instead of the simple U-shaped curves as used earlier on the Philips TL-W of 1964. And I wonder which of these companies was first with the flat fluorescent lamp.
|
|
|||
|
I'm unsure of the specs of the tube, I've ahd the tube 3 years and only dared fire it up recently.
|
|
|||
|
They might have had trouble with the glass cracking on so many bends, hence the joins?
|
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |