FILE 14/50 |
|
|||
|
File information | |
Filename: | 20220123_160217.jpg |
Album name: | Mrstreetlight / Street Lighting Maintenance |
Filesize: | 3567 KiB |
Date added: | 25 Jan, 2022 |
Dimensions: | 4032 x 1908 pixels |
Displayed: | 37 times |
URL: | http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=17419 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |
|
|||
It's strange seeing a SON-E in this. I'm used to seeing T lamps used usually. Will certainly give a nice soft light.
|
|
|||
I'm really pleased how the light these give off is softer to the eye and i feel makes better use of the optic
|
|
|||
E lamps do look better in these
|
|
|||
I always had a soft spot for SON E, mostly as they were common in MK and they gives off a nicer light why people moved away from SON E to SON T i'm not sure?
|
|
|||
Indeed.
|
|
|||
Son t cheaper and more light output.
|
|
|||
Makes sense then why SON E went out of favour towards the mid 2000s when cost cutting and more bang for the buck..
|
|
|||
high wattage son I lamps actually came to be in the late 1960's in street lighting, think large wattage sonI lamps fell out of favour in the 1980's
|
|
|||
Ooh really! Was the idea of SON I swap from MBFU?
|
|
|||
Well when you think of back then when they were being retrofitted into big old lanterns like big G.E.C Z8526 and Thorn Alpha 3 ect, they had optics designed for big MBF lamps.
|
Comment 1 to 10 of 10 Page: 1 |