GEC 125w White (EOL)

Sadly EOL, but worth taking a pic & uploading I think...

GEC 125w White, made in England, shielded cathodes, Thorn made? Date code KK = October 1978? Sadly EOL, one cathode was broken, I shorted it out & tried it, the other cathode glowed briefly before breaking

GEC 125w White (EOL)


Sadly EOL, but worth taking a pic & uploading I think...

GEC 125w White, made in England, shielded cathodes, Thorn made? Date code KK = October 1978? Sadly EOL, one cathode was broken, I shorted it out & tried it, the other cathode glowed briefly before breaking

20180120_181242_HDR.jpg 20180125_222840.jpg 20180203_150207-1.jpg 20180212_004134_HDR.jpg 20180319_232207.jpg
File information
Filename:20180203_150207-1.jpg
Album name:fluorescent / Fluorescent Tubes
Manufacturer:GEC (Thorn)
Type/Model:125w White
Wattage:125w
Date manufactured:October 1978
Filesize:1083 KiB
Date added:03 Feb, 2018
Dimensions:2678 x 1431 pixels
Displayed:59 times
URL:http://80.229.24.59:9232/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=7451
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 18 of 18
Page: 1

Danny   [03 Feb, 2018 at 03:27 PM]
Thorn made. Must of lost vacuum. No surprises there then lol. Thorn tubes are shit
fluorescent   [03 Feb, 2018 at 04:11 PM]
Yup. Got another one like this but Thorn branded, exactly the same broken cathode and lost vacuum. They're both on the scrap tube pile now.
Liam   [03 Feb, 2018 at 04:20 PM]
Shame its dead. Don't think i've seen a Thorn made GEC like this before.
Danny   [03 Feb, 2018 at 05:09 PM]
Thorn tubes seem to have a shelf life in my expierience. The seals just fail after a while. I’m guessing there’s absolutely no signs of any damage? Last time I tested my tubes a load of my thorns were dead or seals had failed. And they’d only just been sitting there!
fluorescent   [03 Feb, 2018 at 09:35 PM]
I read somewhere that the copper leads corrode that pass through the glass and it breaks the seal, and that Thorn's were prone to it due to poor quality copper used. No idea if that's fact or theory, but sounds plausible, especially as this one has been sat in a damp workshop unused for 20 years.
Simon_R   [03 Feb, 2018 at 09:47 PM]
Nice oldie...Shame its dud!
Slyspark   [03 Feb, 2018 at 09:53 PM]
sounds completely plausible. That was what I always wondered might be the cause.
Danny   [03 Feb, 2018 at 10:08 PM]
It’s a friggin shame though coz this one is a really nice one! It’s annoying as it is always the “nicest” ones
FrontSideBus   [03 Feb, 2018 at 10:39 PM]
Wasn't the lead wires in the seal made from niobium or something like that so it has the same thermal expansion as the glass? I'd be tempted to smash it up and have a look at the internal construction.
eclipsislamps   [03 Feb, 2018 at 11:15 PM]
Yeh its called 'dumet' wire, its a nickel/iron alloy cored wire with a copper layer on the outside, with the copper being about 30% of the total mass. It has to be prepared by oxidising the surface before sealing it into a tube otherwise it wont wet the glass and will eventually leak or crack the pinch. Bubbles can also form around this seal and if they are near enough to the inside of the tube, they can chip out of the glass and contaminate the lamp if its exposed to large or sudden temperature swings, especially running it for a short time after its been in the cold with the cathode heat conducting down it, as dan found out with his ascot tubes from eveready.
eclipsislamps   [03 Feb, 2018 at 11:19 PM]
Ive been told a healthy dumet seal should be the same colour as red wine, if it looks coppery its bad.
fluorescent   [03 Feb, 2018 at 11:26 PM]
That's very interesting, thanks for the info. I'll smash the end off and have a look sometime
Danny   [03 Feb, 2018 at 11:30 PM]
I lost 6 of the Ascot tubes for this sadly. Lit them too soon and they were still stone cold through. At least I’ve still got 9 good ones lol. Although the other 6 would of been nice too!
Kev   [04 Feb, 2018 at 08:44 AM]
What a gem shame this is EOL!
lampy   [04 Feb, 2018 at 09:51 PM]
thorn tubes are shit danny? thought they were some of the old time greats? age can play a part on failing if kept in poor conditions i guess
Slyspark   [04 Feb, 2018 at 10:33 PM]
Personally, I like Thorn tubes - a great bit of British history. It's a shame tho that they do seem a little less robust than some tubes are when they age. I've had 3 40w Kolorite tubes either lose vacuum or ring off, which is a shame as I only purchased 3 in the first place. Touch wood tho, they do seem to be the only ones. Maybe a bad batch / stored somewhere damp / subject to some sort of stress or abuse somewhere in the 30 odd yrs since they were made. Who knows?
Danny   [07 Dec, 2018 at 11:39 PM]
I now have a gec 125w warm white with brass end caps
fluorescent   [30 Apr, 2019 at 11:41 AM]
Based on my experience of lamp bin raiding etc, Thorn/Atlas/BLI/TEI (pick any) tubes are less robust than some other manufactures. I've previously seen (and currently own) a few GB Philips tubes that have obviously been bashed around and abused but still work fine. I've seen Thorn tubes still in cardboard sleeves that haven't been used suffer from cracked/fallen off ends. Not really scientific testing, just my observations.

This tube is now being made into a Crompton LED tube ....possibly. It went to the recycle bin anyway!

Comment 1 to 18 of 18
Page: 1

Add your comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed here. Log in to post your comment